FedInsider.com will bring you fortnightly the voices
of those in the government community driving change. You'll hear about leaders
from both government and industry who will lead and manage government through
transition to the next Administration. Watch your inbox on the 1st and 15th every
month.
—7/1/08

- June 17, 2008
- June 3, 2008
- May 21, 2008
- April 30, 2008
- April 2, 2008
- March 19, 2008
- February 27, 2008
- February 6, 2008
- January 23, 2008
- January 8, 2008
- December 15, 2007
TOM TEMIN - A trusted member of the Federal community, Tom has had a seat at
the table from which to inform us on the issues of the day for more than 16 years.
As the editor of FedInsider.com, Tom will continue to bring you viewpoints on
the issues of the day. Read Tom's Bio. |
FedInsider.com is published by
Hosky Communications Inc.
3811 Massachusetts Ave.
Washington, D.C. 20016
202-237-0300
Publisher: Tom Hosky
Editor: Tom Temin,
Thomas R Temin Associates
Design: Denise Hyatt-Roberts, Cyber
Services, Inc.
Marketing: Kathryn Nanai,
Hosky Communications Inc.
|
|
IRMCO
AWARDS HONOR THE BEST IN PUBLIC SERVICE
Every month, it seems, one group or another announces winners in an awards
program for government. Less common are programs in which government agencies
and individuals receive awards based on judgments by their peers.
But the annual IRMCO awards carry just that cachet. According to Michele
Heffner, who is IRMCO program manager at the General Services Administration,
nominations can come from anyone. They are open until Feb. 8. Just go
to the IRMCO web site for details
and nomination forms. -> Read More
YOUR NEXT STOP MIGHT BE TO A VIRTUAL WORLD
If you think virtual worlds and online gaming are merely kid stuff,
think again.
Several federal agencies and contractors—such as the National
Guard and IBM—are pursuing use of 3-dimensional virtual world
technologies for collaboration. Learn about the impact this is having
on government. -> Read More
NO ONE EVER WENT BROKE PAYING INCENTIVE FEES
What do the Empire State Building and the Springfield interchange
have in common? The iconic office building and the suburban Washington,
D.C. massive highway intersection project were both finished on time
and within budget, albeit some 75 years apart. But there’s a difference.
-> Read More
-
Every month, it seems, one group or another announces winners in
an awards program for government. Less common are programs in which
government agencies and individuals receive awards based on judgments
by their peers.
But the annual IRMCO awards carry just that cachet. Each year,
a panel consisting of the IRMCO executive steering committee, considers
some 40 nominations for team awards and 25 for individual awards.
Awards go to people who have made a demonstrable difference in overcoming
obstacles and organizational challenges and rendered measurable
improvements.
In light of the recent presidential order mandating agencies to
appoint performance improvement officers, the emphasis on measurable
results is particularly apropos.
 |

Michele Heffner, IRMCO Program Director,
GSA, talks about the IRMCO awards.
|
According to Michele Heffner, who is IRMCO program manager at the
General Services Administration, nominations can come from anyone.
They are open until Feb. 8. Just go to the IRMCO web site for details
and nomination forms.
Should you or your nominee win, you’d be in good company.
For example, last year’s individual award recipient was Donald
Babers, deputy regional director, office of Field Policy Management
at the Housing and Urban Development Department. He was cited for
work to get people housed in the Hurricane Katrina aftermath. Group
recipient was a combination of HUD, Social Security Administration
and Health and Human Services employees. They created the Enterprise
Income Verification System, which supported efforts to cut improper
payments and make public housing more available to people most in
need. The program was said to have avoided $712 million in costs—and
got it off the Government Accountability Office’s high risk
list.
Return to top
-
If you think virtual worlds and online gaming are just kid stuff,
think again.
Several federal agencies and contractors—such as the National
Guard and IBM—are pursuing use of 3-dimensional virtual world
technologies for collaboration. As Wired
Magazine recently reported, “IBM has created a massive complex
of adjoining islands dedicated to recruitment, employee training,
and in-world business meetings. Coldwell Banker has opened a virtual
real estate office.”
More significantly, there’s a Federal
Consortium for Virtual Worlds, one sponsor of which is National
Defense University. Better touch up your avatar and get into the
right enclave. The consortium is holding its second conference April
24, 2008, just a couple of weeks after IRMCO.
 |

A Second Life virtual world explored
by NASA |
Don’t know what we’re talkin’ about? You’re
not alone. The online virtual world phenomenon has several million
participants via commercial web sites, mainly www.secondlife.com
of Linden Research, Inc. of San Francisco. The pros and cons of
this branch of social networking have been analyzed endlessly by
the press. Yet many in government don’t realize the technology
has practical applications.
“Social networking is clearly Web 2.0,” says Paulette
Robinson, assistant dean for teaching, learning and technology in
the IRM College at NDU. “Virtual worlds are taking the next
step.” Robinson will be speaking about use of virtual worlds
at IRMCO.
A quick definition: In Second Life-style virtual worlds, individuals
create an online, 3-D version of themselves, called an avatar. The
avatar can be directed to visit a 3-D zone called an island, where
it can interact with other people’s avatars. Think of it as
conversation by proxy, or 3-D video conferencing. Islands are also
called enclaves.
One shortcoming of existing technology is a limit on the number
of avatars that can fit simultaneously on an island. Second Life,
with its clunky, vintage-looking 3-D, is no John Madden Football
for your Sony Wii. But for business or educational applications,
it is good enough.
Government faces obvious challenges of its own, notably network
security and the need to be open only to authenticated users. Plus,
to participate even in a private island in the public virtual world,
a user must download client software. “That’s a problem
for the federal government,” Robinson says. She adds she is
hoping for Linden Labs to ship a behind-the-firewall version of
its reality software in 2009 that government agencies would feel
confident in using. In the meantime, the government is using is
own virtual environments.
“Right now, we have lab-based enclaves closed off from the
network. And the ports are turned off after an event,” Robinson
says.
And what exactly do government people do, virtually?
Robinson sees applications in education, training via simulation,
and intelligence data visualization. She says the National Guard
is integrating Google Maps with virtual reality to create emergency
training programs for federal and state/local responders.
Another VR application is simply letting people get together without
having to travel to an office. This could be particularly important
in a continuity of operations situation with employees unable to
get to the office. In a virtual world, people—their avatars
as proxies—would, for instance, move into a conference room,
chat with one another before hearing from the bureau chief or secretary
and watching a presentation.
Current technology is limited. Fewer than 100 people can inhabit
a virtual enclave simultaneously. But you can run more than one
enclave at a time. At last November’s conference, the consortium,
according to Robinson, drew 175 people in person, plus another 182
viewing in Second Life or on a conventional web site.
Return to top
-
What do the Empire State Building and the Springfield interchange
have in common? The iconic office building and the massive, suburban
Washington, D.C. highway intersection project were both finished
on time and within budget, albeit some 75 years apart.
But unlike the private construction project, the publicly funded
road
project—which helped ease congestion at one of the worst
interchanges in the United States—was subject to an incentive
contract which paid bonuses for early completion.
Amazing what incentives spark in contractor performances. Yet few
federal agencies use them, fearing oversight backlash. That could
change following December’s Office of Management and Budget
guidance
on use of incentive fees in acquisitions. The thinking is, if you
set up the incentive fees according to the rules, you’ll avoid
oversight problems—and get better contractor performance.
Make no mistake: The Federal Acquisition Regulation specifically
allows incentive fees. But buying officials must justify them in
the acquisition plan, and make sure the performance goals eligible
for incentive fees are clearly detailed. Just paying a fee for acceptable,
let alone less-than-satisfactory, performance won’t cut it.
Keep in mind, if you want to make incentive fees part of your acquisitions,
your agency must designate a point of contact for them and send
his or her contact information to Susan
Truslow at the Office of Federal Procurement Policy.
Return to top
|
advertisements
IRMCO 2008 Presentations
GSA's Executive Management Conference
IRMCO 2008 Keynotes:
Paul Cosgrave
CIO and Commissioner, Department of Information
Technology and Telecommunications,
City of New York
Todd Davis
CEO, LifeLock
The Honorable
Norman Y. Mineta
former Congressman, Secretary of the Department
of Commerce, Secretary of the
Department of Transportation
Governor Martin O'Malley
State of Maryland (invited)
Robert Shea
Associate Director for Administration and
Government Performance, OMB
Mary Crane
Bridging the Generation Gap
Karen Evans
Administrator, Information Technology and
E-Government, United States
Ken Cochrane
Chief Information Officer, Canada
Laurence Millar
Deputy Commissioner, Information and Communications
Technologies, New Zealand
Ann Steward
Chief Information Officer, Australia
John Suffolk
Chief Information Officer,
United Kingdom
|